
Recently I was at the Henry House, which is a local pub. After I finished my steak and kidney pie I drew a face on the chalk board they use for keeping score in dart games. It was only a few lines, extremely simple. No one saw me draw it but everyone recognized as my drawing. Every one thought it was really interesting that you could recognize the hand in a drawing even if there is only a few lines. It made me think of what Uri Schulevitz said about drawing being like hand writing, unique to that person.
Later, Tara Larson Chang recommended I read Maggie Stiefvater's blog (
http://greywarenart.blogspot.com/) , Where she was having an extended discussion about style and her theory of style. For the sake of economy I'll pare down her idea to this, style is achieved through combining different elements of your art work into one unified style. There is a lot more to it than that, so I suggest you read it for yourself. This prompted me to return to my own posts on style from last October; Illustration and Style and Another Note On Style. Here I asked whether one should consciously persue a style. The majority of you who commented felt that style is something that occurs without conscious effort, there were a few exceptions. In any case, the comments were a lot more interesting than my post...
Reading through my posts last October I realized I had put forth no concrete theory on what style means. So, for the sake of clarity I'll tentatively put forward a definition of style by contrasting it to my definition of stylization. The dictionary succinctly defines style as a "manner of doing something". Here's what I think:
Style is your approach to the fundamentals of art, the way you draw a line, the shapes and forms you tend toward, your tendencies with values.
Stylization on the other hand is the way you approach the literal, figurative elements. If you draw the same type of nose over and over again, the same distortions of perspective, the choice to use local colours etc...
This is possibly a naive attempt on my part to defend my own prejudices about art, or it could be more objective than that. I'm not sure. What do you think about my theory?